| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
hackersmovie Veteran Member


Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 3080 Location: Maryland, U.S.A
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pleiades Veteran Member

Joined: 14 Oct 2006 Posts: 3237 Location: California
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, that should be fine. The Merom Core2Duo chips are pin compatible with the socket your iMac has.
Certainly an expensive way to go, but it would be unique. _________________ MacBook Pro 1.83GHz Core Duo, 2GB RAM, 250GB HD, Dell 802.11n card, 1.4TB external
MacBook 1.83GHz Core Duo, 2GB RAM, 60GB HD
iMac 1.83GHz Core Duo, 2GB RAM, 160GB HD, 1TB external, EyeTV Hybrid |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fox Veteran Member


Joined: 01 Feb 2006 Posts: 2640 Location: Peterborough, Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 7:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
You could save about $150 if you go to the Merom 2.16 ghz Core 2 duo. TIn my opinion, the 10% gain in processor speed with the 2.33 (which would translate to something less than that in actual operation) would be worth a 50% higher cost for the processor. _________________ Mini 1: 2.3 ghz Core i5; 8 gb RAM, Corsair 240gb SSD, 500 gb Seagate XT
Mini 2: 2.26 ghz Core 2 duo, 8 gb RAM, 500 gb Seagate
Also a Cube, 13" MacBook Air, 20" 2.66 ghz iMac & 11.6" Acer 1810TZ running Ubuntu & openSuse |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|