| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
NRecob Member

Joined: 13 Aug 2007 Posts: 210
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 3:50 pm Post subject: Super Duper, CCC or Time Machine backup 4 New HDD? |
|
|
Haven't done any HDD copying recently--what's the general consensus for software to use? The last time I did this it was about 2 years ago and I can't remember which software I used [Carbon Copy Cloner or Super Duper].
Thoughts? What cloning software do you use now?
OR, do you just load your new drives with a backup from Time Machine?
Thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
g5g5 Veteran Member


Joined: 25 Jan 2005 Posts: 2716 Location: Virginia
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 4:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There are probably as many SuperDuper fans out there as CCC fans, but I continue to use CCC for cloning and backing up drives. The 3.x versions of the software have been pretty solid too. Those were released since the last time you were using CCC or SuperDuper. I would definitely download the latest and give it a whirl. It's a solid application. _________________ 1.25GHz Mac Mini / 1.8GHz iMac G5 / 2.0GHz C2D Mac mini (2009)
4GB iPod mini / 2G iPod shuffle / 16GB iPhone 3G
Apple TV 2
iLife's a Bitch! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NRecob Member

Joined: 13 Aug 2007 Posts: 210
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| g5g5 wrote: | | There are probably as many SuperDuper fans out there as CCC fans, but I continue to use CCC for cloning and backing up drives. The 3.x versions of the software have been pretty solid too. Those were released since the last time you were using CCC or SuperDuper. I would definitely download the latest and give it a whirl. It's a solid application. |
Thanks g5g5. Downloaded the latest version of CCC and am now cloning my HDD--Easy Peasy!
Thanks again! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zedtvl Senior Member


Joined: 11 Sep 2006 Posts: 418 Location: AZ/Usa
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 8:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was using CCC but now I find super duper more user friendly... _________________ Mac Mini i5 2.5 GHZ, 16GB Ram.
Macbook pro 2008 Core 2 Duo, 256GB SSD, 2.5GHz, 6GB Ram
Dead PowerBook 180, M4440 33 MHz, 8 MB ram. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fox Veteran Member


Joined: 01 Feb 2006 Posts: 2630 Location: Peterborough, Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
I find both to be easy to use, but I mostly use CCC. I started using it years ago when the developer (Mike Bombich) indicated that he didn't want shareware contributions from university folk. It wasn't the $10 fee so much as the statement that impressed me, as I eventually made a $25 contribution. CCC seems to have a few options that SD doesn't, but both are really excellent. Once when I had a problem cloning with CCC and SD, I emailed the developer of SD and was very impressed with how quickly he responded. After that, I felt obligated to buy it as well.
Bottom line: you can't go wrong with either product. And I think that both are much better for cloning than Time Machine. I use TM as well, but for the ability to recover old files rather than for cloning. _________________ Mini 1: 2.3 ghz Core i5; 8 gb RAM, Corsair 240gb SSD, 500 gb Seagate XT
Mini 2: 2.26 ghz Core 2 duo, 8 gb RAM, 500 gb Seagate
Also a Cube, 13" MacBook Air, 20" 2.66 ghz iMac & 11.6" Acer 1810TZ running Ubuntu, Mint & openSuse |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NRecob Member

Joined: 13 Aug 2007 Posts: 210
|
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Fox wrote: | I find both to be easy to use, but I mostly use CCC. I started using it years ago when the developer (Mike Bombich) indicated that he didn't want shareware contributions from university folk. It wasn't the $10 fee so much as the statement that impressed me, as I eventually made a $25 contribution. CCC seems to have a few options that SD doesn't, but both are really excellent. Once when I had a problem cloning with CCC and SD, I emailed the developer of SD and was very impressed with how quickly he responded. After that, I felt obligated to buy it as well.
Bottom line: you can't go wrong with either product. And I think that both are much better for cloning than Time Machine. I use TM as well, but for the ability to recover old files rather than for cloning. |
Interesting background on Mike Bombich. RARE as hell these days for a developer to offer really great software to use thats not dumbed down/a trial before purchase....
Thanks Fox et al for the information--APPRECIATE IT!
HAPPY HOLIDAYS! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bandit Bill Veteran Member


Joined: 07 Jun 2005 Posts: 5793 Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
|
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I used to use SuperDuper until OS X Leopard came out. CCC was the first to support Leopard so I switched back then and never found the need to go back to SuperDuper as both are equally as good in my book.
Flip a coin. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NRecob Member

Joined: 13 Aug 2007 Posts: 210
|
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bandit Bill wrote: | I used to use SuperDuper until OS X Leopard came out. CCC was the first to support Leopard so I switched back then and never found the need to go back to SuperDuper as both are equally as good in my book.
Flip a coin. |
Thanks for the info Bandit Bill. Appreciate it!
Happy Holidays! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iMav Veteran Member


Joined: 13 Feb 2005 Posts: 2171 Location: Columbus, WI
|
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you are just cloning a disk, no need for ANY of those products. Just use Disk Utility.
I use it all the time when I upgrade hdd's. _________________ -=iMav=-
http://geekhack.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NRecob Member

Joined: 13 Aug 2007 Posts: 210
|
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| iMav wrote: | If you are just cloning a disk, no need for ANY of those products. Just use Disk Utility.
I use it all the time when I upgrade hdd's. |
OK iMav I'll check it out--upgrading the HDD is all I did.....
THANKS!
HAPPY HOLIDAYS! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bandit Bill Veteran Member


Joined: 07 Jun 2005 Posts: 5793 Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
|
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 12:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| iMav wrote: | If you are just cloning a disk, no need for ANY of those products. Just use Disk Utility.
I use it all the time when I upgrade hdd's. |
Will it be bootable if the original HD was bootable? It should be, but I'm just checking.
Funny, I've never used Disk Utility to clone a drive yet.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
philiparcario Veteran Member

Joined: 19 Jun 2006 Posts: 4567 Location: Howell NJ USA
|
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 6:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
all my disk utility clones failed at booting _________________ 2010 Mm 2.4 C2D oem 320gb hdd 8gb ram
2012Mm base 2.5 with 16gb ram diy fusion drive
2012Mm quad with 8gb ram oem 1tb hdd
promise pegasus r6 3x 3tb + 3x 4tb =21tb hdds
lacie little big disk 2x 512gb ssds
synology 2tb disk station |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NRecob Member

Joined: 13 Aug 2007 Posts: 210
|
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| philiparcario wrote: | | all my disk utility clones failed at booting |
Well this is good to know-thanks Philip.
HAPPY HOLIDAYS! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TonyMontana Veteran Member


Joined: 24 Jul 2006 Posts: 1945 Location: Missoula, MT
|
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
I swap between the two of them. Every once in a while there will be a volume that won't clone correctly with one, but the other will make a bootable just fine. I do however use CCC to do a full nightly back up of just the changes from that day. Time machine is turns my machine to sludge. _________________ MacMini 2.0GHz C2D (2009)
MacMini 2.16GHz Intel Core Duo
Dell Mini 10v *OSX 10.6.4* |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iMav Veteran Member


Joined: 13 Feb 2005 Posts: 2171 Location: Columbus, WI
|
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You have to use the "Restore" functionality within Disk Utility.
Drag the source disk to "source", drag the destination drive to "destination"...click restore. A bootable clone will be the result.
I've done this at least a dozen times (mostly when upgrading to bigger hdd's). _________________ -=iMav=-
http://geekhack.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|