| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
JohnnyBoy Veteran Member


Joined: 13 Jul 2007 Posts: 3954 Location: West Sussex, South-East England
|
Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 6:34 pm Post subject: "Spaces" on a Mac 512K |
|
|
There was a poll a while back asking who was going to upgrade to Leopard. I said that I wasn't, and also speculated that "Spaces" could have been implemented on System 7. Turns out, I was being far too conservative.
Check out this vid, which dates from 1985. Zip it forward to 4:58, where Andy Herzfeld shows off the hack he created over a weekend and which Apple paid him $100,000 for . Does this look familiar to Leopard users, or what? _________________ Intel Mini 2.0GHz C2D (4GB/120GB/SuperDrive/10.5.8 ), 120GB WD Passport, Logitech ergo k/b
iPod Touch (32GB, 3rd gen), iPod Shuffle (512MB, 1st gen) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
devo Veteran Member


Joined: 23 Jan 2005 Posts: 5273 Location: Dunwoody, GA
|
Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 8:46 pm Post subject: Re: "Spaces" on a Mac 512K |
|
|
| That's pretty neat JB. Spaces remains one of my favorite new features. I think Apple did a nice job implementing it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JohnnyBoy Veteran Member


Joined: 13 Jul 2007 Posts: 3954 Location: West Sussex, South-East England
|
Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 11:41 pm Post subject: Re: "Spaces" on a Mac 512K |
|
|
| devo wrote: | | That's pretty neat JB. Spaces remains one of my favorite new features. I think Apple did a nice job implementing it. |
I agree Devo. Although my Mini's still running Tiger, my MacBook came with Leopard, and Spaces is really useful on a machine whose primary display is relatively small and non-upgradeable. _________________ Intel Mini 2.0GHz C2D (4GB/120GB/SuperDrive/10.5.8 ), 120GB WD Passport, Logitech ergo k/b
iPod Touch (32GB, 3rd gen), iPod Shuffle (512MB, 1st gen) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WheelSpinners Veteran Member

Joined: 25 May 2007 Posts: 743
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 1:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
They got it right, but it took them 20+ years.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris..S Veteran Member

Joined: 25 Feb 2007 Posts: 704
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 3:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think they did. Transition triggers are too limited and the eye candy is extraordinarily plain. I found VirtueDesktops easier to use, but unfortunately too buggy to live with.
Spaces is generally pretty stable but it still has a tendency to put "popup" windows on the wrong (current) "space" - and then switch to the "space" where the application actually resides, leaving you with a non-responsive application and a hunt through all the desktops to find the (urgent dialog) window. Sometimes it also clashes with the screen saver, leaving the screen strobing between desktop and screensaver (my bet is this is spaces although my only evidence is anecdotal). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scooper Veteran Member

Joined: 05 Mar 2006 Posts: 988
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 9:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Spaces is cool, but I'd like to see a live and more realistic icon in the Dock. Kind of like the standard GNOME desktop icons, but with more realistic thumbnails inside each space. If that makes any sense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|