| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
admin Site Admin

Joined: 21 Jan 2005 Posts: 2067 Location: U.S.A
|
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 5:04 pm Post subject: TimeMachineScheduler 2.0 |
|
|
TimeMachineScheduler 2.0
Friday, January 4, 2008
Posted by: Brian
Stefan Klieme has released TimeMachineScheduler 2.0. This simple application disables the automatic hourly backup function of Time Machine and installs its own launchd daemon. The backup interval can then be set between 1 and 12 hours with a slider control in the application. You can also click on a "Run Backup Now" button to backup immediately, or schedule a backup at startup. We're talking about total control over your backups here! So what's new in version 2.0?
Changes include:
- Automount, an option to mount and unmount the backup volume automatically
- Option to hide the backup volume
- Uses now a launchd daemon instead of an agent
- Improved authentication management
- French and Spanish localization
- Italian localization
TimeMachineScheduler 2.0 requires Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard or later. The download weighs in at 1.6MB.
http://www.123macmini.com/news/story/846.html
Last edited by admin on Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:09 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hackersmovie Veteran Member


Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 3080 Location: Maryland, U.S.A
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Weee Veteran Member


Joined: 30 Sep 2005 Posts: 808 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'll pass, but you might be able to save some disk space by stretching things out. Are backups every hour really necessary? It seems a little like overkill. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jb Veteran Member


Joined: 19 Aug 2006 Posts: 653 Location: A large Island called Vancouver
|
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This might be less glamorus, but it gets the job done.
If you think Time Machine backs up too often (or not often enough) for your liking, navigate into /System » Library » LaunchDaemons. There you'll find a file named com.apple.backupd-auto.plist. Open it in your favorite text editor, and look for this section:
<key>StartInterval</key> <integer>3600</integer>
Change the 3600 number to some other time interval in seconds, and you'll have changed Time Machine's backup interval.
jb |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pleiades Veteran Member

Joined: 14 Oct 2006 Posts: 3237 Location: California
|
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 3:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jb wrote: | | This might be less glamorus, but it gets the job done. |
Just an FYI, TAB reports that adjusting the plist isn't reliable for adjusting TM backup schedules. _________________ MacBook Pro 1.83GHz Core Duo, 2GB RAM, 250GB HD, Dell 802.11n card, 1.4TB external
MacBook 1.83GHz Core Duo, 2GB RAM, 60GB HD
iMac 1.83GHz Core Duo, 2GB RAM, 160GB HD, 1TB external, EyeTV Hybrid |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scooper Veteran Member

Joined: 05 Mar 2006 Posts: 993
|
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Does this interfere at all with your ability to excluded new folders or the ones that you aleady have? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
supasnail Member


Joined: 10 Oct 2007 Posts: 81
|
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 1:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Time Scheduler as far as I can tell, turns time machine off, then accesses Time Machine at your specified interval (3 hours in my case) and does a manual back-up. This seems to work well enough, but when Time Machine was switched on, its backup timings were erratic - several times per hour unless the scheduler was uninstalled. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
devo Veteran Member


Joined: 23 Jan 2005 Posts: 5290 Location: Dunwoody, GA
|
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I really haven't been bothered or bogged down by the frequency of backups, but I like the idea of having more control over TM. So I would be happy to see Apple bring some of these features to TM down the road. Until then, I'll wait patiently. When's 10.5.2 coming out again?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
garty Junior Member

Joined: 25 Aug 2006 Posts: 47
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| hackersmovie wrote: | Anyone been using this? I don't see the reason. TimeMachine by itself is a wonder. For my usage I see no flaws with TM so I'll be following the old "If it ain't broke, don't fix it". . .
My 2 cents. . . |
Kind of my sentiments too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|