123Macmini.com
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   GalleryPhoto Gallery   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

found cell phone

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    123Macmini.com - Forums Forum Index -> Mac Mini Upgrading
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
sross
Member
Member


Joined: 01 Aug 2005
Posts: 168
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 5:34 pm    Post subject: found cell phone Reply with quote

beneficial to weight loss and general health. And also seeds, pulses tissue salt Calc Fluor to pregnant leads to pancreatic fatigue and chronically elevated blood-sugar levels
underestimated and ingestion may not constitute the maintenance levels, I feel that 1 g/lb is more than sufficient but I don?t need the nasty emails from people sonably sure that you can
roles of each protein and the growth The two antibodies also differ in their abil- toxic chemicals (e.g. cytochrome P450 1A1
water. Cover the jar with cheesecloth, secure level at a less than ideal size than it is go through a short period of somewhat uncomfortable change? intervention clinical trial studies, 7
_________________
mac mini 1.42/1gig ram/bluetooth/
airport/superdrive/80gig for storage/
new 250gig Maxtor 7200 16meg cache external for Xbench 1.2 overall 48.25


Last edited by sross on Tue Sep 07, 2010 1:06 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Gmas
Junior Member
Junior Member


Joined: 21 Jun 2005
Posts: 44

PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 6:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

well, it depends on whether the new models are PPC or intel based. My guess is that it would work fine in the first case, but not at all in the second, but feel free anyone who knows better to correct me....


Gmas.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
homerjatmoes
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 323
Location: Elmira, NY

PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 6:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gmas wrote:
well, it depends on whether the new models are PPC or intel based. My guess is that it would work fine in the first case, but not at all in the second, but feel free anyone who knows better to correct me....


Gmas.

It won't boot because it would need OS X for x86, although it would be easier to copy over your settings and applications (which should run under Rosetta).
_________________
1.42Ghz
1GB RAM
200GB FW HDD (Boot drive)
80GB HDD
External DVD burner
45.23 Xbench 1.2 average
FireWire Boot Guide
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
fullroast
Junior Member
Junior Member


Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 40

PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 9:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

homerjatmoes wrote:
It won't boot because it would need OS X for x86, although it would be easier to copy over your settings and applications (which should run under Rosetta).


Isn't that assuming that the next new Mac mini's will be Intel based? Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gmas
Junior Member
Junior Member


Joined: 21 Jun 2005
Posts: 44

PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 9:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

fullroast wrote:
homerjatmoes wrote:
It won't boot because it would need OS X for x86, although it would be easier to copy over your settings and applications (which should run under Rosetta).


Isn't that assuming that the next new Mac mini's will be Intel based? Smile


I think he was responding to the second part of my comment that noted OSX would probably not boot on Intel Macs.

I think there will probably be one more update before the Macintels, that's my best guess anyways.


Gmas.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
homerjatmoes
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 323
Location: Elmira, NY

PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 9:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

fullroast wrote:
homerjatmoes wrote:
It won't boot because it would need OS X for x86, although it would be easier to copy over your settings and applications (which should run under Rosetta).


Isn't that assuming that the next new Mac mini's will be Intel based? Smile

Yes I was speaking of the later on pure assumption, but after this last "update" I think there will only be minor changes to the mini untill the Intel hardware is ready. I'm probably wrong but it does make sense.
_________________
1.42Ghz
1GB RAM
200GB FW HDD (Boot drive)
80GB HDD
External DVD burner
45.23 Xbench 1.2 average
FireWire Boot Guide
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Gmas
Junior Member
Junior Member


Joined: 21 Jun 2005
Posts: 44

PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

homerjatmoes wrote:
fullroast wrote:
homerjatmoes wrote:
It won't boot because it would need OS X for x86, although it would be easier to copy over your settings and applications (which should run under Rosetta).


Isn't that assuming that the next new Mac mini's will be Intel based? Smile

Yes I was speaking of the later on pure assumption, but after this last "update" I think there will only be minor changes to the mini untill the Intel hardware is ready. I'm probably wrong but it does make sense.


What else could they upgrade? Whatever it is, it cannot be minor, right?

Well, maybe 64 of video, and 1.5 to 1.67 of CPU bump, but I think that would not be minor!!

Gmas.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
homerjatmoes
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 323
Location: Elmira, NY

PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gmas wrote:
What else could they upgrade? Whatever it is, it cannot be minor, right?

Well, maybe 64 of video, and 1.5 to 1.67 of CPU bump, but I think that would not be minor!!

Gmas.

Without revising the current main board they can increase CPU speed, increase hdd speed and space, upgrade the superdrive to the next fastest model, and lower the price. The CPU and HDD upgrades would be better than the last "update".
_________________
1.42Ghz
1GB RAM
200GB FW HDD (Boot drive)
80GB HDD
External DVD burner
45.23 Xbench 1.2 average
FireWire Boot Guide
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
TheModWiki.org
Member
Member


Joined: 04 Jul 2005
Posts: 145

PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 11:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I doubt anything's going down until Intel chips.... mac predict says January 5th or 6th the mini has a 56.4% chance of getting an Intel chip
_________________
Computational Media Major Student @ Georgia Tech
1.42 @ 1.5 Mac Mini, Wifi, BT
1GB PNY Optima DDR400
Maxtor 300GB Ext. FW
Pioneer DVR-K05 SD

www.PaulStamatiou.com , 9rules Network
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Gmas
Junior Member
Junior Member


Joined: 21 Jun 2005
Posts: 44

PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 11:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

macpredict has been pretty reliable, right?

Then, we are the proud owners of the last PPC mac mini!! Yay!!

Gmas.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sross
Member
Member


Joined: 01 Aug 2005
Posts: 168
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ahhh, I didn't think about the osx intel version being needed. I doubt I'll be ugrading for a year or more anyways. Also I was wondering the mini is 1.42ghz with a 64bit OS, so would it be the equivalent of a 3ghz 32bit cpu and OS? Are all the apps for OSX 64bit? thanks!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
homerjatmoes
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 323
Location: Elmira, NY

PostPosted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sross wrote:
ahhh, I didn't think about the osx intel version being needed. I doubt I'll be ugrading for a year or more anyways. Also I was wondering the mini is 1.42ghz with a 64bit OS, so would it be the equivalent of a 3ghz 32bit cpu and OS? Are all the apps for OSX 64bit? thanks!

No Tiger was the first 64 bit OS from Apple and 32 bit apps can run happily on it. 64 bit all depends on the programmer and if they want to code a Tiger only ^$ bit app or a 32 bit app that will run on older versions of OS X as well.
_________________
1.42Ghz
1GB RAM
200GB FW HDD (Boot drive)
80GB HDD
External DVD burner
45.23 Xbench 1.2 average
FireWire Boot Guide
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Susurrus
Veteran Member
Veteran Member


Joined: 05 May 2005
Posts: 1303
Location: Providence, Rhode Island

PostPosted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 2:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Steve said we should be seeing Mactels in about a year at his keynote in June. Why is everyone saying January for an update. Yes, there is a Macworld or Mac Expo or whatever they're called and the timing seems right, but I rarely remember Steve ever being early on his predictions, only late (3.0Ghz PB).

I also think that it's weird that Steve would start from the bottom to integrate X86 into the Macintosh lineup (hopefully it'll actually be x86-64 and OSX will require that so that it won't be able to run on 32bit only hardware). It makes more sense for Apple to maintain the prestige of its prosumer level computers by adding Intel chips there, first. The distinction between the two is less about performance now as it is about features, while adding an Intel chip is about features, hopefully it'll offer a nice performance boost to x86 native code over the RISC equivalent. I would actually bet that a new PB would be more in line for a star Mactel release than a Mini or iBook. It's similar to how the iMac/eMac/iBook/Mini took/are taking forever to get onto G5s, because it separates the lineup on performance, feature set of the G5 chips ignored.
_________________
Computer Engineer
Junior, Brown University
15" NC8430 HP Laptop
1.42Ghz PPC Mac Mini, 1Gb RAM, 1st Gen
40GB G4 iPod
2GB Black iPod Nano
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
tokenboy
New Member
New Member


Joined: 10 Aug 2005
Posts: 9
Location: Calgary

PostPosted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 3:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TheModWiki.org wrote:
I doubt anything's going down until Intel chips.... mac predict says January 5th or 6th the mini has a 56.4% chance of getting an Intel chip


56.4%!!!

I think the odds are more likely to be 55.7%

Laughing
_________________
867-5309
Ask for Jenny
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    123Macmini.com - Forums Forum Index -> Mac Mini Upgrading All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



      

Shop:  Apple Store  |  Refurbished Macs  |  Refurbished iPads  |  MacConnection  |  Mac Mini Vault  |  Other World Computing

MK 1 Studio Mac mini Racks  |  Crucial Mac Memory  |  Top Free Mac Apps  |  Top Paid Mac Apps



123Macmini.com is an independent publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or approved by Apple Computer, Inc.
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2011 123Macmini.com. All Rights Reserved.