| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
sross Member


Joined: 01 Aug 2005 Posts: 168 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 5:34 pm Post subject: found cell phone |
|
|
beneficial to weight loss and general health. And also seeds, pulses tissue salt Calc Fluor to pregnant leads to pancreatic fatigue and chronically elevated blood-sugar levels
underestimated and ingestion may not constitute the maintenance levels, I feel that 1 g/lb is more than sufficient but I don?t need the nasty emails from people sonably sure that you can
roles of each protein and the growth The two antibodies also differ in their abil- toxic chemicals (e.g. cytochrome P450 1A1
water. Cover the jar with cheesecloth, secure level at a less than ideal size than it is go through a short period of somewhat uncomfortable change? intervention clinical trial studies, 7 _________________ mac mini 1.42/1gig ram/bluetooth/
airport/superdrive/80gig for storage/
new 250gig Maxtor 7200 16meg cache external for Xbench 1.2 overall 48.25
Last edited by sross on Tue Sep 07, 2010 1:06 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gmas Junior Member

Joined: 21 Jun 2005 Posts: 44
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well, it depends on whether the new models are PPC or intel based. My guess is that it would work fine in the first case, but not at all in the second, but feel free anyone who knows better to correct me....
Gmas. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
homerjatmoes Senior Member


Joined: 12 Jul 2005 Posts: 323 Location: Elmira, NY
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gmas wrote: | well, it depends on whether the new models are PPC or intel based. My guess is that it would work fine in the first case, but not at all in the second, but feel free anyone who knows better to correct me....
Gmas. |
It won't boot because it would need OS X for x86, although it would be easier to copy over your settings and applications (which should run under Rosetta). _________________ 1.42Ghz
1GB RAM
200GB FW HDD (Boot drive)
80GB HDD
External DVD burner
45.23 Xbench 1.2 average
FireWire Boot Guide |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fullroast Junior Member

Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 40
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| homerjatmoes wrote: | | It won't boot because it would need OS X for x86, although it would be easier to copy over your settings and applications (which should run under Rosetta). |
Isn't that assuming that the next new Mac mini's will be Intel based?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gmas Junior Member

Joined: 21 Jun 2005 Posts: 44
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| fullroast wrote: | | homerjatmoes wrote: | | It won't boot because it would need OS X for x86, although it would be easier to copy over your settings and applications (which should run under Rosetta). |
Isn't that assuming that the next new Mac mini's will be Intel based?  |
I think he was responding to the second part of my comment that noted OSX would probably not boot on Intel Macs.
I think there will probably be one more update before the Macintels, that's my best guess anyways.
Gmas. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
homerjatmoes Senior Member


Joined: 12 Jul 2005 Posts: 323 Location: Elmira, NY
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| fullroast wrote: | | homerjatmoes wrote: | | It won't boot because it would need OS X for x86, although it would be easier to copy over your settings and applications (which should run under Rosetta). |
Isn't that assuming that the next new Mac mini's will be Intel based?  |
Yes I was speaking of the later on pure assumption, but after this last "update" I think there will only be minor changes to the mini untill the Intel hardware is ready. I'm probably wrong but it does make sense. _________________ 1.42Ghz
1GB RAM
200GB FW HDD (Boot drive)
80GB HDD
External DVD burner
45.23 Xbench 1.2 average
FireWire Boot Guide |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gmas Junior Member

Joined: 21 Jun 2005 Posts: 44
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| homerjatmoes wrote: | | fullroast wrote: | | homerjatmoes wrote: | | It won't boot because it would need OS X for x86, although it would be easier to copy over your settings and applications (which should run under Rosetta). |
Isn't that assuming that the next new Mac mini's will be Intel based?  |
Yes I was speaking of the later on pure assumption, but after this last "update" I think there will only be minor changes to the mini untill the Intel hardware is ready. I'm probably wrong but it does make sense. |
What else could they upgrade? Whatever it is, it cannot be minor, right?
Well, maybe 64 of video, and 1.5 to 1.67 of CPU bump, but I think that would not be minor!!
Gmas. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
homerjatmoes Senior Member


Joined: 12 Jul 2005 Posts: 323 Location: Elmira, NY
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gmas wrote: | What else could they upgrade? Whatever it is, it cannot be minor, right?
Well, maybe 64 of video, and 1.5 to 1.67 of CPU bump, but I think that would not be minor!!
Gmas. |
Without revising the current main board they can increase CPU speed, increase hdd speed and space, upgrade the superdrive to the next fastest model, and lower the price. The CPU and HDD upgrades would be better than the last "update". _________________ 1.42Ghz
1GB RAM
200GB FW HDD (Boot drive)
80GB HDD
External DVD burner
45.23 Xbench 1.2 average
FireWire Boot Guide |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheModWiki.org Member

Joined: 04 Jul 2005 Posts: 145
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I doubt anything's going down until Intel chips.... mac predict says January 5th or 6th the mini has a 56.4% chance of getting an Intel chip _________________ Computational Media Major Student @ Georgia Tech
1.42 @ 1.5 Mac Mini, Wifi, BT
1GB PNY Optima DDR400
Maxtor 300GB Ext. FW
Pioneer DVR-K05 SD
www.PaulStamatiou.com , 9rules Network |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gmas Junior Member

Joined: 21 Jun 2005 Posts: 44
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 11:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
macpredict has been pretty reliable, right?
Then, we are the proud owners of the last PPC mac mini!! Yay!!
Gmas. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sross Member


Joined: 01 Aug 2005 Posts: 168 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ahhh, I didn't think about the osx intel version being needed. I doubt I'll be ugrading for a year or more anyways. Also I was wondering the mini is 1.42ghz with a 64bit OS, so would it be the equivalent of a 3ghz 32bit cpu and OS? Are all the apps for OSX 64bit? thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
homerjatmoes Senior Member


Joined: 12 Jul 2005 Posts: 323 Location: Elmira, NY
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| sross wrote: | | ahhh, I didn't think about the osx intel version being needed. I doubt I'll be ugrading for a year or more anyways. Also I was wondering the mini is 1.42ghz with a 64bit OS, so would it be the equivalent of a 3ghz 32bit cpu and OS? Are all the apps for OSX 64bit? thanks! |
No Tiger was the first 64 bit OS from Apple and 32 bit apps can run happily on it. 64 bit all depends on the programmer and if they want to code a Tiger only ^$ bit app or a 32 bit app that will run on older versions of OS X as well. _________________ 1.42Ghz
1GB RAM
200GB FW HDD (Boot drive)
80GB HDD
External DVD burner
45.23 Xbench 1.2 average
FireWire Boot Guide |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Susurrus Veteran Member


Joined: 05 May 2005 Posts: 1303 Location: Providence, Rhode Island
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 2:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Steve said we should be seeing Mactels in about a year at his keynote in June. Why is everyone saying January for an update. Yes, there is a Macworld or Mac Expo or whatever they're called and the timing seems right, but I rarely remember Steve ever being early on his predictions, only late (3.0Ghz PB).
I also think that it's weird that Steve would start from the bottom to integrate X86 into the Macintosh lineup (hopefully it'll actually be x86-64 and OSX will require that so that it won't be able to run on 32bit only hardware). It makes more sense for Apple to maintain the prestige of its prosumer level computers by adding Intel chips there, first. The distinction between the two is less about performance now as it is about features, while adding an Intel chip is about features, hopefully it'll offer a nice performance boost to x86 native code over the RISC equivalent. I would actually bet that a new PB would be more in line for a star Mactel release than a Mini or iBook. It's similar to how the iMac/eMac/iBook/Mini took/are taking forever to get onto G5s, because it separates the lineup on performance, feature set of the G5 chips ignored. _________________ Computer Engineer
Junior, Brown University
15" NC8430 HP Laptop
1.42Ghz PPC Mac Mini, 1Gb RAM, 1st Gen
40GB G4 iPod
2GB Black iPod Nano |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tokenboy New Member

Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 9 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TheModWiki.org wrote: | | I doubt anything's going down until Intel chips.... mac predict says January 5th or 6th the mini has a 56.4% chance of getting an Intel chip |
56.4%!!!
I think the odds are more likely to be 55.7%
 _________________ 867-5309
Ask for Jenny |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|