| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
dirtychinchilla
Member
Joined: 08 Jan 2007
Posts: 178
Location: London, UK
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 2:03 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| If anything I think people wouldn't switch after using safari. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SOCOMRAIDER
Veteran Member
Joined: 26 Oct 2005
Posts: 2869
Location: Minneapolis
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Safari 3 seems slower to me.. Mostly talking about when I refresh pages, it is usually faster in 2 to me. But that just might be me though.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
newuser74
New Member
Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 11
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I tried to install the Safari 3 Beta to my Core Duo Mini and the installer wouldn't let me. I have 10.4.9 and plenty of disk space but I got a message that said that the volume does not meet the requirements. Anyone else have this problem?
On topic - I like the Cover Flow for Finder and Quick View feature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
splen
Senior Member
Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 384
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The problem I was having with the Apple site was due to the fact I was using SafariStand, I have removed it and now it works fine. Shame though, I like safaristand.
Oh and is the safari 3 beta brushed metal for everyone else as well? 
_________________
mac mini coreduo 1.66ghz. 1.25gb 60gb HD
macbook pro 13inch 2.26ghz. 2gb. 250g HD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TyPod
Veteran Member
Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 2184
Location: WI
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| splen wrote: | | Oh and is the safari 3 beta brushed metal for everyone else as well? |
Mine is. I think Safari 3 seems faster than 2, but I may just be excited about the new version. I had no problems installing, and it seems to run well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blazer
Veteran Member
Joined: 23 Mar 2005
Posts: 1061
Location: San Ramon, California
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 3:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TonyMontana wrote: | This 64bit core animation crap ( which is very cool by the way ) is going to leave us stock Mini owners behind.  |
I'm ready to roll, unless the Intel GMA 950 isn't supported. See signature. 
_________________
1.42GHz Mac mini
2.0GHz Core 2 Duo Mac mini
2.0GHz Core 2 Duo Mac mini (2009)
2.5GHz Core i5 Mac mini (2011)
24" Dell LCD & 42" Sharp TV
EyeTV 250 Plus
1G, 2G, 3G, 4G and 5G iPod nanos
16GB 3G iPhone |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D444niel
Senior Member
Joined: 13 Mar 2007
Posts: 275
Location: Essex, UK
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Leopard interface looks great. If there is no new mini then I will upgrade to Intel 2.0 C2D to complement the recently installed 2gb ram.
_________________
Too much spec to add here .... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jedaffra
New Member
Joined: 15 Oct 2006
Posts: 10
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 5:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ah, I like just about everything I saw from Steve and company today ... with the exception of Safari for Windows . I mean, they're hearts in the right place in terms of the strategy behind the move, but just put Firefox next to Safari - to be blunt, it's Ugly. The menu's are ugly, the colors don't look right ... I dunno, maybe it's just me, but I felt it stuck out like a sore thumb. Safari looks great on a mac, but it I found it didn't translate well on MS Windows.
On the plus side of todays keynote, I thought the desktop tweaks in Leopard were excellent: I liked the new dock look, desktop and I thought the stacks features were intriguing.
The rest of the "announcements" seemed like a rehash of previous keynotes: Spaces, TimeMachine, Boot Camp, etc. There had been alot of recent talk about the inclusion of ZFS from Sun for TimeMachine and I was suprised there was nothing about this.
Oh well, at least the mini lives another day  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
devo
Veteran Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2005
Posts: 5274
Location: Dunwoody, GA
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 6:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I was shocked to come home tonight and not see anything new in the way of hardware. Leopard on the other hand is looking totally sweeeeeeeet. I really like the new Desktop, Finder and Quick Look. I also continue to look forward to Spaces. The new Apple website is cool too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TyPod
Veteran Member
Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 2184
Location: WI
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| devo wrote: | | I was shocked to come home tonight and not see anything new in the way of hardware. Leopard on the other hand is looking totally sweeeeeeeet. I really like the new Desktop, Finder and Quick Look. I also continue to look forward to Spaces. The new Apple website is cool too. |
I was also surprised there were no hardware upgrades either. All the software they showed looks killer though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
devo
Veteran Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2005
Posts: 5274
Location: Dunwoody, GA
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TyPod wrote: | | devo wrote: | | I was shocked to come home tonight and not see anything new in the way of hardware. Leopard on the other hand is looking totally sweeeeeeeet. I really like the new Desktop, Finder and Quick Look. I also continue to look forward to Spaces. The new Apple website is cool too. |
I was also surprised there were no hardware upgrades either. All the software they showed looks killer though. |
I haven't been able to read everything around, but it doesn't look like iLife or .Mac were mentioned either. Apple is becoming very predictably unpredictable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sross
Member
Joined: 01 Aug 2005
Posts: 168
Location: New Zealand
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| no new hardware. /cry |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WheelSpinners
Veteran Member
Joined: 25 May 2007
Posts: 743
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I wonder what was under those banners? Doesn't Apple usually try to hide product announcements like that? Could something have been pulled at the last minute? Please don't tell me they were for a Windows version of Safari. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jbstingray
Veteran Member
Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Posts: 677
Location: In a Mac.
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
They were just banners of the features in Leopard... nothing secret, really.
-jb
_________________
Mac mini 1.66Ghz, 1GB RAM, Bose Companion 5 Speakers, Sony XBRITE 19"; iMac Indigo Slot-Loading, 500Mhz G3, 512MB
iPod Nano 8GB x2, iPod 5G 30GB, iPod Photo 20GB, iPod mini x2, Apple iPhone 8GB |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pleiades
Veteran Member
Joined: 14 Oct 2006
Posts: 3237
Location: California
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 2:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
I wasn't shocked about no new hardware. WWDC historically is almost always about software. Plus we had the MBP release about a week ago.
Overall, I'm satisfied with the announcements. It's nice to see at least one engineer is working on Leopard, instead of everyone on the iPhone.
_________________
MacBook Pro 1.83GHz Core Duo, 2GB RAM, 250GB HD, Dell 802.11n card, 1.4TB external
MacBook 1.83GHz Core Duo, 2GB RAM, 60GB HD
iMac 1.83GHz Core Duo, 2GB RAM, 160GB HD, 1TB external, EyeTV Hybrid |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ 
Search 
Memberlist 
Photo Gallery
Register
Profile 
Log in to check your private messages 
Log in 
