| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
gigaguy Senior Member

Joined: 23 Jun 2007 Posts: 466 Location: AusTX
|
Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 6:31 pm Post subject: iPod audio quality |
|
|
I love the iPod design and interface, no one beats it.
Listening to a friend's 1gen nano, I was dismayed at the sound, I actually got fatigued after a few songs. It sounded too compressed and rough.
I've always used Sony mp3 players and they have an amazingly full & rich sound I like. I actually used a higher bitrate encoding songs from CD for the ipod than the Sony had. I used mp3 encoding.
My friends agreed the Sony sounded better.
I'm not trying to bash the iPod. I'd like to get one to use with my new Mac Mini but to me the sound is disappointing. Is there a way to make it sound better? I used some pretty good Sony in-ear phones. The iPod equalizer did not improve the sound but actually showed how limited the sound is. To me the ipod is an Audi in design, but a Yugo in sound.
Anybody else hear the difference between a Sony and an iPod?
Maybe it's telling that the Apple web pages do not mention any of the sound attributes or audio features. come on, it's an audio player!
Not a basher... just disappointed.
Maybe they improved the audio aspects, but don't mention anything about it? too bad, it's a beautiful design and interface. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JohnnyBoy Veteran Member


Joined: 13 Jul 2007 Posts: 3954 Location: West Sussex, South-East England
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 1:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
As a Mac owner it's difficult to compare. Whereas some MP3 player manufacturers simply don't mention whether their products work with OS X, Sony make it clear that their's don't. _________________ Intel Mini 2.0GHz C2D (4GB/120GB/SuperDrive/10.5.8 ), 120GB WD Passport, Logitech ergo k/b
iPod Touch (32GB, 3rd gen), iPod Shuffle (512MB, 1st gen) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pleiades Veteran Member

Joined: 14 Oct 2006 Posts: 3237 Location: California
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A couple of questions for you --
Did you use the exact same MP3 file on each player? If not, did you encode the one for the iPod using iTunes and it's MP3 encoder? If so, the problem may lie in the area that iTunes' MP3 encoder isn't terribly good, as compared to it's AAC encoder. Personally, I encode MP3s using LAME, and just import it to my iPod, as Apple's MP3 encoder quality is apparent to even my "too many concerts" eardrums. I'd also suggest some blind tests, see if you can eliminate any unintentional feelings from one player to another.
From what I've read on the web, audiophiles say that the best quality player (in terms of sound quality) that Apple makes is the shuffles. I have a 1G shuffle, and I can tell a slight difference in the quality of sound it produces versus my 30GB 5G, but it's something I have to really concentrate to find, and I can only hear it on certain tracks. _________________ MacBook Pro 1.83GHz Core Duo, 2GB RAM, 250GB HD, Dell 802.11n card, 1.4TB external
MacBook 1.83GHz Core Duo, 2GB RAM, 60GB HD
iMac 1.83GHz Core Duo, 2GB RAM, 160GB HD, 1TB external, EyeTV Hybrid |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gigaguy Senior Member

Joined: 23 Jun 2007 Posts: 466 Location: AusTX
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wow, I'm surprised the lower cost shuffles are considered better sounding.
I did encode @ 160 using itunes from CD to mp3 for the Nano, it sounded like compressed FM radio. Files on my Sony @ 128 sounded better. I did wonder if encoding to mp3 on itunes was why it sounded worse than my non-itunes mp3s I had on the Sony.
I'll try different encoding tests. What encoder do you recommend? Is it free and easy to dowwnload and use?
I'm getting a new Nano delivered next week.
I want to try Apple lossless too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cypher Veteran Member


Joined: 24 Jan 2007 Posts: 2912 Location: North West - UK
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
have a look at MAX
http://sbooth.org/Max/ _________________ Phil
Mac Mini 2.53GHz - iMac 2.0Ghz - Macbook Pro 2.4GHz - iPad 1 32GB 3G
6TB Netgear Ready NAS NV+ - 6TB Drobo S |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pleiades Veteran Member

Joined: 14 Oct 2006 Posts: 3237 Location: California
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 2:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As Cypher recommended, Max. Max is what I use to rip MP3s using LAME.
I'd also take a look at Apple's default encoder, AAC. _________________ MacBook Pro 1.83GHz Core Duo, 2GB RAM, 250GB HD, Dell 802.11n card, 1.4TB external
MacBook 1.83GHz Core Duo, 2GB RAM, 60GB HD
iMac 1.83GHz Core Duo, 2GB RAM, 160GB HD, 1TB external, EyeTV Hybrid |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JohnnyBoy Veteran Member


Joined: 13 Jul 2007 Posts: 3954 Location: West Sussex, South-East England
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gigaguy wrote: | | I'm getting a new Nano delivered next week. |
Hey, gigaguy, if you're trying to make me jealous.........it's working.  _________________ Intel Mini 2.0GHz C2D (4GB/120GB/SuperDrive/10.5.8 ), 120GB WD Passport, Logitech ergo k/b
iPod Touch (32GB, 3rd gen), iPod Shuffle (512MB, 1st gen) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gigaguy Senior Member

Joined: 23 Jun 2007 Posts: 466 Location: AusTX
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 3:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well you should get one, you deserve it! do they not sell them in the UK yet?
I got the entry 4gb silver, and with an employee discount. I really like the Touch models but a little e$travagant for my needs right now. I also hope to upgrade my 1.66 MacMini in Oct to the 2.0 too so I can't splurge on the pricier Touch player.
I just hope I can get the Nano to sound good. I'm spoiled by my Sony player that really sounds sweet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|