| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
admin Site Admin

Joined: 21 Jan 2005 Posts: 2047 Location: U.S.A
|
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 2:17 pm Post subject: Matrox Intros DualHead2Go Digital Edition |
|
|
Matrox intros DualHead2Go Digital Edition
Monday, January 8, 2007
Posted by: Glenn
Matrox Graphics today announced the DualHead2Go Digital Edition, the next version to the acclaimed DualHead2Go, now featuring digital outputs. This external multi-display upgrade device connects to the VGA output of compatible notebook or desktop computers and through patent-pending technology uniquely expands the desktop across two digital displays. DualHead2Go Digital Edition also enables support for high-resolution panels, offering a stretched desktop of up to 3840x1200 (or dual 1920x1200) across two displays. The DualHead2Go Digital Edition has a suggested retail price of $229.
http://www.123macmini.com/news/story/588.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yvan256 Veteran Member


Joined: 18 Aug 2005 Posts: 541 Location: Quebec, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 2:36 pm Post subject: Digital? VGA? |
|
|
From what I've seen on the product page, it takes a VGA input and splits it into two DVI outputs?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Weee Veteran Member


Joined: 30 Sep 2005 Posts: 804 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I guess it converts the signal.
Why wouldn't they just go with DVI the whole way around? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SOCOMRAIDER Veteran Member


Joined: 26 Oct 2005 Posts: 2869 Location: Minneapolis
|
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It does convert the signal. I guess this was to be an upgrade for all those VGA only computers who want to use two displays. Though for Mac users it would have been nice if it was DVI all around. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bsnoel Senior Member


Joined: 04 Jun 2005 Posts: 355 Location: USA
|
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't quite get that VGA thing either. Why not run DVI all the way? There must be a technical reason, but its beyond me. _________________ Mac Pro Quad 2.66GHz, PowerMac G5 2.3 GHz, iMac Core Duo 17", MacBook Pro 2GHz, MacBook Pro 2.2GHz, Mac mini Core 2 Duo 1.83GHz. Multi-K9 Security System. No false alarms, just lots of sharp teeth.
www.grweather.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fuji257 Member

Joined: 05 Mar 2006 Posts: 140
|
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 9:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
2x 1280 x 1024 is effectively the max resolution. Any higher res and you gotta go < 70Hz
Anything under 70Hz makes my eyes bleed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
manic42 Junior Member


Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 40
|
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 9:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
hmmm.. so u cant really hook up 2x 20" ACD's can you?
thats pants.. i wanna get another 20" ACD to go with my setup but i guess im gonna have to wait even londer.. bloody waiting games!!!! _________________ intel mini Core Duo 2.0ghz
20" Apple Cinema Display |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|