| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jase Member


Joined: 11 Feb 2005 Posts: 164 Location: RapidCity, SD
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 9:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I guess maybe I'm closer to the target market for the AOpen Mini-lookalike.
I bought the Mini primarily because of its size, and because it runs almost silently. OS X wasn't a big draw for me. I like it. It's very nice. But I'm also completely satisfied with Linux as well for my purposes as well. Either OS will work just fine for what I need.
I just got tired of big, noisy boxes. The Mini was the first system that solved both of those problems, so I bought it. And I'm incredibly happy with it.
This little AOpen box might allow me to do exactly the same thing, but with Linux instead. I certainly wouldn't replace the Mini, but it might make a nice complimentary system. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blazer Veteran Member


Joined: 23 Mar 2005 Posts: 1066 Location: San Ramon, California
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jase wrote: | | I just got tired of big, noisy boxes. The Mini was the first system that solved both of those problems, so I bought it. And I'm incredibly happy with it. |
I think we've all become spoiled with the mini's silence. Doesn't every computer seem "really" noisy now! It'll be interesting to see what Pandora's final specs are. I hate to say it but the Pentium M is a pretty nice chip with a ton of level 2 cache. _________________ 1.42GHz Mac mini
2.0GHz Core 2 Duo Mac mini
2.0GHz Core 2 Duo Mac mini (2009)
2.5GHz Core i5 Mac mini (2011)
24" Dell LCD & 42" Sharp TV
EyeTV 250 Plus
1G, 2G, 3G, 4G and 5G iPod nanos
16GB 3G iPhone |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
idave Senior Member


Joined: 24 Jan 2005 Posts: 463
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jase wrote: | I guess maybe I'm closer to the target market for the AOpen Mini-lookalike.
I bought the Mini primarily because of its size, and because it runs almost silently. OS X wasn't a big draw for me. I like it. It's very nice. But I'm also completely satisfied with Linux as well for my purposes as well. Either OS will work just fine for what I need.
I just got tired of big, noisy boxes. The Mini was the first system that solved both of those problems, so I bought it. And I'm incredibly happy with it.
This little AOpen box might allow me to do exactly the same thing, but with Linux instead. I certainly wouldn't replace the Mini, but it might make a nice complimentary system. |
I'm not big on Windows or Linux, but I'm a sucker for new technology.  _________________ 14" 1.25GHz G4 iBook (died)
1.42GHz Mac mini (almost dead)
1.66GHz Core Duo Mac mini (sold)
2.0GHz Core 2 Duo Mac mini '09 (sold)
2.3GHz quad-core Intel Core i7 Mac mini |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ihatewindowsbashers New Member

Joined: 31 May 2005 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 11:31 pm Post subject: The Mac-Mini sucks |
|
|
Here's why:
1.25GHz PowerPC G4
256MB DDR333 SDRAM
ATI Radeon 9200 with 32MB DDR video memory
40GB Ultra ATA hard drive
Combo drive
DVI or VGA video output
AirPort Extreme and Bluetooth optional
And let's get one thing clear Mac OS X is UNIX. You're paying $500 for a cheap POS that barely has any power (read 1.25 GHz and 256MB DDR333 SDRAM). I could build a better PC put Linux or ever (gasp) Windows and not pay for anything. The nice thing about Microsoft is MSDN which my school has (XP Pro for free? Yes!, and it's legal). Oh and here's another thing, in 10+ years of working on the Windows platform, 6 of which were spent programming I've only seen the BSOD once, and it was on Windows ME (which is the only Windows that I'll say sucks). Windows isn't that bad, if you know what you're doing. Plus the sheer amount of good, quality software is rivaled only by Linux. I hate the Mac (sadly I've used it before) and the way it is setup is illogical, nonsensical, and poorly done. I hate not being able to upgrade, the fact that almost every piece of software costs you money, and it's poor support. I'll stick with "Wintel" because it's higher quality, and if there is something wrong it doesn't cost me much to fix it.
There's a reason why Windows and Linux are favored over Mac. They are poor as gaming machines, poor as servers, and Linux beats it for work. They may have graphics (maybe...). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LouieMacGoo Veteran Member


Joined: 01 Apr 2005 Posts: 590 Location: Livonia, Michigan
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2005 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
O.K. Well back to the subject at hand! It will be interesting to see how it messures up as far as specs vs cost. I might concider one to to play with some flavor of Linux on it, but I have a hunch that it won't last long once Apple Legal gets rolling. _________________ 13' Macbook 2.0ghz C2D w/2gb RAM and 120gb HD
G4 Mac Mini 1.42ghz w/1gb RAM, 80gb HD, SuperDrive, 160gb MiniStack
eMac 700mhz G4 PPC 1gb RAM 40gb HD, Combo drive
G3 iMac DV 400mhz 512mg RAM 40gb HD, SuperDrive
Follow me http://twitter.com/louiemacgoo |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jase Member


Joined: 11 Feb 2005 Posts: 164 Location: RapidCity, SD
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2005 5:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| idave wrote: |
I'm not big on Windows or Linux, but I'm a sucker for new technology.  |
Well, there's always that, too... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
devo Veteran Member


Joined: 23 Jan 2005 Posts: 5288 Location: Dunwoody, GA
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2005 7:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| idave wrote: |
Just like my Mac mini 2nd generation concept the Pandora has no modem, horizontal USB ports, and Audio-in. Does anyone know what the exact dimensions are? |
15 cm by 15 cm by 5 cm. That's a tad smaller than the mini! There is more information about the machine in a new press release. Like it has YPbPr connectors.
http://club.aopen.com.tw/news/News_ShowAnswer.aspx?RecNo=8387&Language=English |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
andp Senior Member

Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 358
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2005 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| LouieMacGoo wrote: | O.K. Well back to the subject at hand! It will be interesting to see how it messures up as far as specs vs cost. I might concider one to to play with some flavor of Linux on it, but I have a hunch that it won't last long once Apple Legal gets rolling. |
Do you think Apple legal will prevail and be able to stop them from releasing Pandora? It sounds like Intel and Microsoft have flexed some muscle behind the scenes and may be offering AOpen some on the QT cover. Even though Pandora is a blatant rip off of the mini it's not 100% same. It has different ports, case, front power button, and internal architecture. Is Apple going to sue the makers of the miniMate and M9 because the case looks the same? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
greg Veteran Member


Joined: 01 May 2005 Posts: 613
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2005 10:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| andp wrote: |
Do you think Apple legal will prevail and be able to stop them from releasing Pandora? |
I'm not sure it matters. Based on some of the previous discussion regarding why people purchased the mini I'm not sure that the Pandora's target audience will be exactly the same. I would expect more gadget freaks or people looking to use it for specialized purposes. I don't see how it would appeal to the run-of-the-mill PC user happily existing in a Windows environment. Small PCs have been around for a while now. _________________ 2.0GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
2GB RAM
miniStack 500GB
Dell 1905FP
Logitech Wave Cordless Desktop |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
senn Junior Member

Joined: 23 Apr 2005 Posts: 21
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2005 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
I can hear the Pandora users now. The hard drive is too slow. The Video card won't run Avalon in Longhorn. VGA output is dim and dark. Not enough USB ports.
Meanwhile the 2nd generation Mac mini will break new ground and continue to set the standard. Intel and Microsoft will freak out and and pay off some vendor you never heard of to make another mini clone. Can't we all just get along! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
James T. Kirk© Member


Joined: 16 Feb 2005 Posts: 133 Location: Europe, the Netherlands
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2005 1:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pandora with Linux, uh, oh; Pandora with MS Windows: Pandora box opened!
But a Mac mini is "A saucerful of secrets"! (if you know your Pink Floyd)
Anyway, I like the TFT screen next to it, anybody knows which one it is??? _________________ take care,
____________________________Jim
~ Registered Linux user #310054 ~
made in Xandros 3.0 (Linux) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
senn Junior Member

Joined: 23 Apr 2005 Posts: 21
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2005 10:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I'd like see the inside of Pandora and how they designed the case to be opened. It would be cool to have thumbscews or clips instead of using a putty knife. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
James T. Kirk© Member


Joined: 16 Feb 2005 Posts: 133 Location: Europe, the Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2005 10:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| senn wrote: | | I'd like see the inside of Pandora and how they designed the case to be opened. It would be cool to have thumbscews or clips instead of using a putty knife. |
Oooh, you know how dangerous it is to open Pandora's box!!
What you probably see is a Intel processor and a mini motherboard and basically the same stuff as a Mac mini, without the cool PowerPC processor  _________________ take care,
____________________________Jim
~ Registered Linux user #310054 ~
made in Xandros 3.0 (Linux) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Brian News Moderator

Joined: 05 Apr 2005 Posts: 543 Location: Charlotte, NC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
James T. Kirk© Member


Joined: 16 Feb 2005 Posts: 133 Location: Europe, the Netherlands
|
Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 1:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
3 USB's, no Firewire. Otherwise, AOpen could have made Apple's next MacTel Mini...  _________________ take care,
____________________________Jim
~ Registered Linux user #310054 ~
made in Xandros 3.0 (Linux) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|