| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
chubbya New Member

Joined: 23 Oct 2009 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:22 am Post subject: New Mac Mini CPU |
|
|
Hello,
Can anyone tell me if the CPU on the new Mini is socketed? I have seen the Colo Teardown but it isn't pictured or mentioned and I have not seen any posts relating to this either...
Thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
guerrillamac2 New Member

Joined: 22 Oct 2009 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 2:48 am Post subject: Socketed |
|
|
I believe the October 2009 versions are running the P8400, P8700, and P8800. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Smithcraft Veteran Member


Joined: 09 Nov 2008 Posts: 1620 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would imagine that they are still BGA, since noting else changed on the board, other than the CPU right?
SC _________________ [Desktop] G4 mini - 1.5Ghz 1GB 80GB HDD - Newer miniStack v2 500GB Seagate - 10.4.11
[Media System] Intel CD mini - 2.16Ghz 2GB 60GB HDD - 3 x WD 1TB MyBook - 10.5.x
Make sure it has pins! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chubbya New Member

Joined: 23 Oct 2009 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Smithcraft wrote: | I would imagine that they are still BGA, since noting else changed on the board, other than the CPU right?
SC |
Make Sense.. But any confirmation? I can't believe they have done a (Real) teardown on the Magic Mouse and the iMac but not the new Mac Mini! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris..S Veteran Member

Joined: 25 Feb 2007 Posts: 646
|
Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The mini server post mentions its identical except for the parts upgrade. I think they would have noticed a socketed cpu and mentioned it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jalyst Member

Joined: 18 Mar 2007 Posts: 204
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 1:41 am Post subject: Re: Socketed |
|
|
I wonder where the person who wrote the wiki article obtained this info from?
If they are in-fact the actual model no's of the CPU's they've gotten from Intel, then they're the exact same model no's used by the Intel retail versions.
And so one could safely deduce that what's sourced from ark, is in fact the correct/full detail about these new Mini CPU's!
http://ark.intel.com/ProductCollection.aspx?familyID=26548
Time to check the sources for that mini article methinks
| guerrillamac2 wrote: |
I believe the October 2009 versions are running the P8400, P8700, and P8800. |
Last edited by jalyst on Sun Oct 25, 2009 1:46 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jalyst Member

Joined: 18 Mar 2007 Posts: 204
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 1:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
user here mentions he can confirm it, he doesn't explicitly say it but I'm assuming he must have already completed a tear down.
http://forums.macrumors.com/showpost.php?p=8702008&postcount=25
| chubbya wrote: | | Make Sense.. But any confirmation? I can't believe they have done a (Real) teardown on the Magic Mouse and the iMac but not the new Mac Mini! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MacDSmith2 Veteran Member


Joined: 17 Aug 2009 Posts: 615 Location: Phoenix
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here is the Intel comparison of all three Mac Mini presumed processor chips: 8400, 8700, 8800: From this comparison, the chips are nearly identical except for the clock speed.
http://ark.intel.com/Compare.aspx?ids=35569,37006,40380,
Notice that the 2.66 model in the high end Mac Mini option just came out 2nd quarter, and yet made it into the OCT 09 upgrade release! That would disprove a lot of complaining that Apple doesn't keep up with processor trends or can't move fast to include new technology in their models! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jalyst Member

Joined: 18 Mar 2007 Posts: 204
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 3:14 am Post subject: Re: Socketed |
|
|
Well the Wiki article turned out to be totally wrong...
It claims the model no's are: P7550, P8700, PP9600
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_Mini
This is them compared....
http://ark.intel.com/Compare.aspx?ids=42014,37006,37266,
If this is true then users with a 2.66Ghz CPU would have 6mb L2 cache and so far none have.
Also based on these model no's, the lowest-end CPU (2.26) doesn't have VT-x!
I'm hoping MacDsmith2 line-up is the one
http://ark.intel.com/Compare.aspx?ids=35569,37006,40380,
| jalyst wrote: | I wonder where the person who wrote the wiki article obtained this info from?
If they are in-fact the actual model no's of the CPU's they've gotten from Intel, then they're the exact same model no's used by the Intel retail versions.
And so one could safely deduce that what's sourced from ark, is in fact the correct/full detail about these new Mini CPU's!
http://ark.intel.com/ProductCollection.aspx?familyID=26548
Time to check the sources for that mini article methinks
| guerrillamac2 wrote: |  |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Smithcraft Veteran Member


Joined: 09 Nov 2008 Posts: 1620 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| MacDSmith2 wrote: | Here is the Intel comparison of all three Mac Mini presumed processor chips: 8400, 8700, 8800: From this comparison, the chips are nearly identical except for the clock speed.
http://ark.intel.com/Compare.aspx?ids=35569,37006,40380,
Notice that the 2.66 model in the high end Mac Mini option just came out 2nd quarter, and yet made it into the OCT 09 upgrade release! That would disprove a lot of complaining that Apple doesn't keep up with processor trends or can't move fast to include new technology in their models! |
When I read 8800, I thought 8080! What a step down!
SC _________________ [Desktop] G4 mini - 1.5Ghz 1GB 80GB HDD - Newer miniStack v2 500GB Seagate - 10.4.11
[Media System] Intel CD mini - 2.16Ghz 2GB 60GB HDD - 3 x WD 1TB MyBook - 10.5.x
Make sure it has pins! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|