| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
nmbob Member

Joined: 11 May 2006 Posts: 76 Location: New Mexico
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 9:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| bsnoel wrote: | | I'm also dissapointed that Time Machine won't work with Airport Disks. Early on, Apple had indicated this would be the case, then suddenly Airport support was removed. |
There was a workaround on one of the *many* forums I've been reading through (with my mouth hanging open as I read through all of the problems people are having...and as I get ready to drive 150 miles to the Apple store in Albuquerque to buy a copy of Leopard anyway ). It was something like get TM to use the disk through a USB cable, then create a file with a specific name *somewhere*, hook the drive to the base station and you're all set. It was really simple, but I don't have ay of the parts so I wasn't paying too much attention. MaxFixIt? MacOSXHints? Someplace like that.
They may have pulled it out because an iterruption to the network connection (airport connections never drop randomly. Do they!?) could scramble your whole backup disk...or something like that. As a programmer I could see something like that happening. I'm sure it'll be back. They're letting 3rd party apps on iPhones, ain't they?
Bob |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blazer Veteran Member


Joined: 23 Mar 2005 Posts: 1066 Location: San Ramon, California
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| nmbob wrote: | Maybe Leopard is really checking the permissions now and Tiger was just playing a game or two of solitaire.  |
Funny, I thought about that. I'm still leaning on the side of this being an issue. 10.5.1 anyone?  _________________ 1.42GHz Mac mini
2.0GHz Core 2 Duo Mac mini
2.0GHz Core 2 Duo Mac mini (2009)
2.5GHz Core i5 Mac mini (2011)
24" Dell LCD & 42" Sharp TV
EyeTV 250 Plus
1G, 2G, 3G, 4G and 5G iPod nanos
16GB 3G iPhone |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bsnoel Senior Member


Joined: 04 Jun 2005 Posts: 355 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 2:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| blazer wrote: | | nmbob wrote: | Maybe Leopard is really checking the permissions now and Tiger was just playing a game or two of solitaire.  |
Funny, I thought about that. I'm still leaning on the side of this being an issue. 10.5.1 anyone?  |
I have another machine to upgrade today. I have deliberately avoided installing the Apple Remote Desktop Client update. I suspect that this update has done something to the catalog. I'll try a repair permissions on this ARDAgent free machine to see if it works any better and I will report back here. _________________ Mac Pro Quad 2.66GHz, PowerMac G5 2.3 GHz, iMac Core Duo 17", MacBook Pro 2GHz, MacBook Pro 2.2GHz, Mac mini Core 2 Duo 1.83GHz. Multi-K9 Security System. No false alarms, just lots of sharp teeth.
www.grweather.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bsnoel Senior Member


Joined: 04 Jun 2005 Posts: 355 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| nmbob wrote: | | bsnoel wrote: | | I'm also dissapointed that Time Machine won't work with Airport Disks. Early on, Apple had indicated this would be the case, then suddenly Airport support was removed. |
There was a workaround on one of the *many* forums I've been reading through (with my mouth hanging open as I read through all of the problems people are having...and as I get ready to drive 150 miles to the Apple store in Albuquerque to buy a copy of Leopard anyway ). It was something like get TM to use the disk through a USB cable, then create a file with a specific name *somewhere*, hook the drive to the base station and you're all set. It was really simple, but I don't have ay of the parts so I wasn't paying too much attention. MaxFixIt? MacOSXHints? Someplace like that.
They may have pulled it out because an iterruption to the network connection (airport connections never drop randomly. Do they!?) could scramble your whole backup disk...or something like that. As a programmer I could see something like that happening. I'm sure it'll be back. They're letting 3rd party apps on iPhones, ain't they?
Bob |
I have seen a few workarounds, but I have not tried any of them yet. It is rumored that Apple is still working on this feature and that it may still make an appearance in a future update. I sure hope so after all the hyping of this feature that Apple created. _________________ Mac Pro Quad 2.66GHz, PowerMac G5 2.3 GHz, iMac Core Duo 17", MacBook Pro 2GHz, MacBook Pro 2.2GHz, Mac mini Core 2 Duo 1.83GHz. Multi-K9 Security System. No false alarms, just lots of sharp teeth.
www.grweather.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Brian News Moderator

Joined: 05 Apr 2005 Posts: 543 Location: Charlotte, NC
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Have a cigar wrote: |
PS: admin, you've got both (G4 and an Intel), have you noticed any difference? |
The menu bar is not transparent on the G4. That might not be such a bad thing though.  _________________ Brian
123Macmini.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bsnoel Senior Member


Joined: 04 Jun 2005 Posts: 355 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bsnoel wrote: | | blazer wrote: | | nmbob wrote: | Maybe Leopard is really checking the permissions now and Tiger was just playing a game or two of solitaire.  |
Funny, I thought about that. I'm still leaning on the side of this being an issue. 10.5.1 anyone?  |
I have another machine to upgrade today. I have deliberately avoided installing the Apple Remote Desktop Client update. I suspect that this update has done something to the catalog. I'll try a repair permissions on this ARDAgent free machine to see if it works any better and I will report back here. |
Well I upgraded the machine and ran the Repair Permissions without the ARDAgent update installed. The result, the repair still took for ever, the only difference was that there were not any errors pointing to the ARDAgent. Oh well, I bet Apple will get to fixing this slow repair issue fairly quickly. _________________ Mac Pro Quad 2.66GHz, PowerMac G5 2.3 GHz, iMac Core Duo 17", MacBook Pro 2GHz, MacBook Pro 2.2GHz, Mac mini Core 2 Duo 1.83GHz. Multi-K9 Security System. No false alarms, just lots of sharp teeth.
www.grweather.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aquaman Veteran Member


Joined: 18 Apr 2005 Posts: 808
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I don't care much for the new system folders. The blues just bend all together. It's hard to tell them apart. Quick Look on the other hand is fantastic. My spacebar is going to get some workout over the next few years. I also like a lot of the new features in Mail. I was thinking about switching to Firebird, but this new version put an end to that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pleiades Veteran Member

Joined: 14 Oct 2006 Posts: 3237 Location: California
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| aquaman wrote: | | I don't care much for the new system folders. The blues just bend all together. |
Agreed! _________________ MacBook Pro 1.83GHz Core Duo, 2GB RAM, 250GB HD, Dell 802.11n card, 1.4TB external
MacBook 1.83GHz Core Duo, 2GB RAM, 60GB HD
iMac 1.83GHz Core Duo, 2GB RAM, 160GB HD, 1TB external, EyeTV Hybrid |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
devo Veteran Member


Joined: 23 Jan 2005 Posts: 5288 Location: Dunwoody, GA
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My super cool looking Leopard box is still sitting on my desk.
I had to work overtime yesterday and got home late Friday night. I'll probably give it a go after the Jets game. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
James T Kirk Veteran Member


Joined: 23 Aug 2005 Posts: 757 Location: The Netherlands, Europe
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As I had a busy weekend and were not able to do much with computers in general and Mac specific, I will buy my new Mini with Leopard coming week. Does anyone who just bought a new Mac know, if it comes with a dedicated Leopard (in my case: specially meant for the Mac Mini) like one had with former Mac's?  _________________ ___________________Jim©
Now on Hackintosh in G5 case! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mr miyagi New Member

Joined: 01 Jul 2007 Posts: 6 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 3:52 pm Post subject: will it slow my mac mini leopard? |
|
|
hi
sorry if this post is in the wrong part of this forum. However i am concerned that my mac mini which is 1.83Ghz intel core duo and has only 512MB and 80GIG ram, will slow down because of the leopard? should i be worried and get more memory instead of 512 get 1GIG, or should i notice no slowness of speed compared to my current os x tiger operating system.
thanks in advance |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blazer Veteran Member


Joined: 23 Mar 2005 Posts: 1066 Location: San Ramon, California
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 4:16 pm Post subject: Re: will it slow my mac mini leopard? |
|
|
| mr miyagi wrote: | hi
sorry if this post is in the wrong part of this forum. However i am concerned that my mac mini which is 1.83Ghz intel core duo and has only 512MB and 80GIG ram, will slow down because of the leopard? should i be worried and get more memory instead of 512 get 1GIG, or should i notice no slowness of speed compared to my current os x tiger operating system.
thanks in advance |
Will it run? Yes. But 512MB isn't going to be sufficient with Leopard once you get rolling. I would suggest moving to at least 1GB, 2GB would be optimal. You will be amazed with the difference in performance. It's well worth the investment. _________________ 1.42GHz Mac mini
2.0GHz Core 2 Duo Mac mini
2.0GHz Core 2 Duo Mac mini (2009)
2.5GHz Core i5 Mac mini (2011)
24" Dell LCD & 42" Sharp TV
EyeTV 250 Plus
1G, 2G, 3G, 4G and 5G iPod nanos
16GB 3G iPhone |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JohnnyBoy Veteran Member


Joined: 13 Jul 2007 Posts: 3954 Location: West Sussex, South-East England
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Blazer is right, and as memory is exceptionally cheap at the moment, now's the time to buy. _________________ Intel Mini 2.0GHz C2D (4GB/120GB/SuperDrive/10.5.8 ), 120GB WD Passport, Logitech ergo k/b
iPod Touch (32GB, 3rd gen), iPod Shuffle (512MB, 1st gen) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yvan256 Veteran Member


Joined: 18 Aug 2005 Posts: 541 Location: Quebec, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'd say that even with Tiger, 1GB is a must. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TonyMontana Veteran Member


Joined: 24 Jul 2006 Posts: 1945 Location: Missoula, MT
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The latest Onyx 1.8.4b (beta) seems to work fine in 10.5.
I ran it with no apparent problems. _________________ MacMini 2.0GHz C2D (2009)
MacMini 2.16GHz Intel Core Duo
Dell Mini 10v *OSX 10.6.4* |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|